I have mused and mused about the human framework and how it would work monetarily in order to promote engagement and prevent languishing with apathy and coasting through life.
But how and why and even how would you make it fair for late comers?
First off, 1 is a whole, and the amount of the day in a tangible form I suppose, so let’s start there. Every day, you have 1.
How do you earn or spend that 1?
Perhaps a historical “stock market” system where-in you’re the commodity and the trend of your effort leans on the weight of your 1. The more you have contributed to the world in progress/skills/development would increase the buying power of 1.
This would obviously need a lot of rules and equations set in place to ultimately value the 1 and ensure a net 0 at the end of the day.
Now the 1 as an item to be spent, that gets tricky. And that’s where I welcome ideas on any medium to flesh out the ideas. I have many means of communication as I do not hide, entirely?
http://ubbus.ca to find me!
So spending I feel would have to be based on consumption of goods and services. Weighted in consumption based in historical data.
As an extreme and solitary view of things, if I streamed 8 hours of music, then the portion of 1 would by 8/24 or 33% of the 1. That would then be proportioned to reimburse the things that made that possible. From the artist to the means it was delivered. To the streaming device, internet provider, hosting service, and artist.
What about the record companies??
What about them? They played no transitory role in the listening of the music. If anything they have their own interaction with the artist, if they’re even needed at all!
Oh, getting sucked into a hole, so lets step back.
Everyone eats!
Food and grocery will be available for all of course. Given that people would have control over their personal info in this framework, they would establish a relationship with the local grocery store or food prep kitchen, and then the communities food needs could be focused on only producing and transporting things that were actually a need for the people they served. So a weighted cost and contribution would be calculated to ensure no one over or under consumed.
Let’s play hypothetical with the “atomic family”
2 adult humans, 2.5 dependents, 2 pets?
The family would have to meal plan a desired meal for a pre-determined future range to ensure item availability (seasonal, logistics, reliability of source…). You would want to have a system that showed frequent options and earliest availability to gamify the meal plan as a family puzzle to complete. Choices would obviously have to be weighted with fail options to provide random occurrences caused by unforeseen issues!
OK, so you’re sinking again, back to the 1, you’re spending and not earning!
Right, future me will delve into this further, hopefully!
So we want to earn, easy…maybe? I guess we can go to a dependent child in the atomic family. They are 1. They, like anyone, need to live and will consume a 1 in activities, education, relaxation, and eating. In order to grow the next generation, they will need the support of the older populace, so they get 1
Children are our future after all, so what, wanna fight about it?!
Calm down… A child wakes, eats, learns, plays, sleeps, everything fun you can remember from your childhood. Cool, their day spent is to be earned by all. Teach a kid, earn from that kid, teach a class, earn from that class. Why not have a bonus based on outcomes?
Yikes, you’re almost giving some loop holes to game a system to exclude low performers such as the neurodiverse like yourself!?
Right right, and I forget where I heard this, but I think it was sometime in the last couple days when this nugget passed though my brain. Capitalists breads “neurotypicals” for their apathy and compliance.
Oh now you’re getting opinionated!
Well, to be fair, my human framework doesn’t fit in a capitalist world by definition! Fair remember.
Right, teach the kids, make that money, gotcha.
But not everyone can or wants to deal with children exclusively, what about everyone else!?
Well work to earn and spend right? More or less.
That then becomes the hiccup in pretend society building right? What would you keep and what would you try to give inspiration to trend the world forward while not stretching too far and bursting the bubble?
Leadership earns rewards?!
If you are enlarging your atomic family by some means, then the weight of dependents counts as a service that the dependent’s 1 goes toward. Even pets!
Want to buy a zoo?
Sure, a zoo or menagerie could be a means of earning. Let’s take a school excursion to a reptile zoo. The live animals would be community interest driven based on surveyed data per region, with multimedia exhibits of animals that are being promoted by the reptile zoo but they are either unable to provide live creature due to costs/viability/existence/wellbeing.
Woah, want to reign in the ideas for future posts maybe? Maybe.
Ooo, random idea… What if I post these as drafts, then produce a video of me narrating it, and then provide that as either a podcast of video? Woah… good idea…
K, well kids, if you learn anything about this, I’m neurodivergent, do drugs, and wish life was fair.
I’ll try to keep rambling on these posts, maybe do what the muses just suggested to me, or maybe I get my affairs in order and finish my own real life needs and ensure my family’s needs are seen to in whatever way I can!
Please join me in talking about these topics on my Discord. If you know me you already know hot to ask for access!
Ubbus out!
Ubbus 